RELASI PILAR KULTURAL-KOGNITIF BERBASIS MULTI-AKTOR DALAM PEMBENTUKAN KELEMBAGAAN PERANGKAT DAERAH (Studi Pembentukan Perangkat Daerah Daerah Kota Palopo)

  • Harsya Harun Fisip, Universitas Andi Djemma, Palopo
  • Andi Meriam Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Andi Djemma Palopo
  • Muhamad Chairul Basrun Umanailo Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Iqra Buru
Keywords: Kultural-Kognitif, Perangkat Daerah, Multi-Aktor

Abstract

Kajian penelitian ini menempatkan keseimbangan kultur dan interpretasi dalam pengambilan keputusan pada pembentukan kelembagaan perangkat daerah melalui keterlibatan multi aktor. Ketidakseimbangan peran dan kapasitas serta dominasi para aktor struktural pemerintahan daerah secara inklusif akan membawa pendulum kultural-kognitif ke orientasi yang formalistis dan birokratis serta sarat dengan kepentingan. Pengabaian peran aktor-aktor yang berasal dari masyarakat berimplikasi pada minimnya daya dukung kultural yang integratif terhadap dimensi normatif dan regulatif yang rentan dengan gagasan dan interpretasi berbasis kepentingan aktor dominan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berbasis kualitatif dengan mengeksplorasi fenomena minimnya peran individu dan masyarakat dalam pembentukan perangkat daerah.  Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan dominannya peran aktor yang ada dalam struktur penyelenggara pemerintahan akan menghasilkan keputusan yang berorientasi pada pola budaya birokrasi dan gagasan yang pada gilirannya mengekploitasi pemaknaan terhadap norma dan regulasi. Norma dan regulasi yang dibentuk untuk mengarahkan tindakan dan perilaku dalam pembentukan perangkat daerah, yang pada akhirnya menjadi norma dan regulasi yang dapat dimodifikasi dan mengikuti kepentingan aktor dominan dan kultur birokratis dalam pengambilan keputusan.

References

[1] Arellano-Gault, D. (2016). The dilemma for the new administrative culture in Mexican public administration: Esprit de corps or individualist bureaucracy? Administrative Culture in Developing and Transitional Countries, hal. 44–56. Diambil dari https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84979052772
[2] Ashworth, R., Boyne, G., & Delbridge, R. (2007). Escape from the Iron Cage? Organizational Change and Isomorphic Pressures in the Public Sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum038
[3] Burns, D., Hambleton, R., & Hoggett, P. (1994). The Politics of Decentralisation: Revitalising Local Democracy. In Teaching Public Administration (Vol. 15). London: The Macmillan Press LTD.
[4] Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2015). Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337.
[5] Dornbusch, S. M., & Scott, W. R. (1975). Evaluation and The Exercise of Authority: A Theory of Control Applied to Diverse Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc., Publishers.
[6] Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A Theory of Fields. New York: Oxford University Press.
[7] Glushko, A., & Marchyshynets, O. (2018). Institutional provision of the state regulatory policy in Ukraine. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(3), 941–948.
[8] Harun, H., Supriyono, B., Haryono, B. S., & Setyowati, E. (2020). Initiating digitalization as institutional changes in institutional government bureaucracy. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 0(March), 2519–2523. Dubay, UAE: IEOM Society International.
[9] Kambau, A. M. C., Sunarding, & Harun, H. (2022). Reformasi Birokrasi dan Gejala Masyarakat Prismatis (Studi Penempatan Pegawai pada Wilayah Kecamatan Wara Timur, Kota Palopo). Dialektika: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Ilmu Sosial, 7(2), 114–125.
[10] Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). Explaining Institutional Change Ambiguity, Agency, and Power (James Mahoney & & K. Thelen, Ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[11] Meriam, A., Harun, H., & Umanailo, M. C. B. (n.d.). Establish Relation in Collaborative Governance in Micro and Small Business Development in Palopo City, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia.
[12] Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., & Thomas, G. M. (1994). Ontology and Rationalization in the Western Cultural Account. In W. R. Scott, J. W. Meyer, & J. Boli (Ed.), Institutional environments and organizations: structural complexity and individualism (hal. 9–26). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
[13] Mudacumura, G. M. (2006). Toward a General Theory of Sustainability. In G. M. Mudacumura, D. Mebratu, & M. S. Haque (Ed.), Sustainable development policy and administratio (hal. 694). New York: CRC Press.
[14] Mudacumura, G. M. (2014). Multiple Dimensions of Governance. In G. M. Mudacumura & G. Morçöl (Ed.), Challenges to Democratic Governance in Developing Countries. New York: Springer.
[15] Osborne, D. (1993). Reinventing Government. Public Productivity & Management Review, 16(4), 349–356. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3381012
[16] Palthe, J. (2014). Regulative , Normative , and Cognitive Elements of Organizations : Implications for Managing Change. Managemet and Organizational Studies, 1(2), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.5430/mos.v1n2p59
[17] Peters, B. G. (2018). The Politics of Bureaucracy, An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration (7 ed.). New York: Routledge.
[18] Rossini, F. A., & Porter, A. L. (1984). Public Participation and Professionalism in Impact Assessment. In J. C. Petersen (Ed.), Citizen Participation in Science Policy (hal. 62–74). Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Press.
[19] Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
[20] Schmidt, V. A. (2017). Theorizing Ideas and Discourse in Political Science: Intersubjectivity, Neo-Institutionalisms, and the Power of Ideas. Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 29(2), 248–263.
[21] Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: ideas, interests and identities (Fourth). California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
[22] Subanda, I Nyoman; Prabawati, N. P. A. (2016). Organizational Restructuring Of Regional Apparatuses Of Denpasar Municipal Government To Achieve Bureaucratic Reform. International Journal of Administrative Science & Organization, 23(2), 63–69. Diambil dari https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jbb/vol23/iss2/1
[23] Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286.
[24] Topal, C. (2019). Coexistence of continuity and change in institutional work. Baltic Journal of Management, 15(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108_bjm-02-2019-0036
[25] Traverso, D. B. (2018). Municipalization as debureaucratization: Municipal reform movement in nineteenth century Chile. Lex Localis, 16(1), 129–146.
[26] Turner, J. H. (2003). Human institutions : a theory of societal evolution. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
[27] Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking In Organizations. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Published
2023-01-31
How to Cite
Harun, H., Meriam, A. and Umanailo, M. C. B. (2023) “RELASI PILAR KULTURAL-KOGNITIF BERBASIS MULTI-AKTOR DALAM PEMBENTUKAN KELEMBAGAAN PERANGKAT DAERAH (Studi Pembentukan Perangkat Daerah Daerah Kota Palopo)”, Jurnal Ilmiah Hospitality, 11(2), pp. 1517-1528. doi: 10.47492/jih.v11i2.2475.
Section
Articles