ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRIK TERHADAP RISET ADVERSITY QUOTIENT SEBAGAI DISPOSISI MATEMATIS DI GOOGLE SCOLAR MENGGUNAKAN VOSVIEWER

Arif Nurhidayat

doi:10.47492/jip.v4i3.2770

Arif Nurhidayat Fakultas Teknik dan Informatika Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v4i3.2770

Keywords: Bibliometrics, Adversity Quotient, Mathematical Disposition, Publish or Perish, Vosviewer

Abstract

This bibliometric analysis is based on the mapping of adversity quotient research as a mathematical disposition based on data on Google Scholar. This study aims to determine the level of development of scientific research in the period 2018-2021. Data collection of 500 data was carried out using the Publish or Perish (PoP) application and mapping with vosviewer. Research data is based on the analysis of the year of publication, name and productivity. The results of the study show an increase in scientific publications in 2019 as many as 122 publications and a decrease in scientific publications in 2020-2021. Semarang State University with the journal.uness.ac.id site is the publisher with the most publications, namely 24 publications. The author with the highest level of scientific publication productivity is Effendi with a total of 6 scientific publications and has close research relationships with several researchers. The research theme that is most closely related to the adversity quotient is the student's problem-solving ability. Meanwhile, the rare theme with adversity quotient is Problem Based Learning (PBL).

References

[1] Andiarna, F., & Kusumawati, E. (2020). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Daring terhadap Stres Akademik Mahasiswa Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Psikologi, 16(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.24014/jp.v16i2.10395
[2] Ansari, B. I. (2016). Komunikasi matematika, strategi berfikir dan manajemen belajar (konsep dan aplikasi). Pena.
[3] Ardiansyah, A. S., Junaedi, I., & Asikin, M. (2018). Student’s Creative Thinking Skill and Belief in Mathematics in Setting Challenge Based Learning Viewed by Adversity Quotient. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 7(1), 61–70.
[4] Arrends, R. I. (2004). Learning to teach. Mc Graww Hill, Co. Inc.
[5] Dina, N. A., Amin, S. M., & Masriyah. (2018). Flexibility in Mathematics Problem Solving Based on Adversity Quotient. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012025
[6] Francis, D. (2000). Adversity Quotient: Turning Obstacles into Opportunities. Technovation, 20(7), 402. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4972(00)00010-9
[7] Hamidah, M. T., & Prabawati, M. N. (2019). Analisis Disposisi Peserta Didik Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Pada Materi Statistika di MTs N 11 Tasikmalaya. Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call For Papers, 373–380.
[8] Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2018). Permendikbud RI Nomor 37 tahun 2018 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 24 tahun 2016 tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. In JDIH Kemendikbud.
[9] Nasution, E. Y. P., Pebrianti, D., & Putri, R. (2020). Analysis of Critical Thinking Disposition of Ips Students in Mathematics Learning. Mathline: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 61–76.
[10] Nurdiansyah, N. W. (2020). Profil Komunikasi Matematika Tulis Siswa Smp Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Matematika Siswa. MATHEdunesa, 9(2), 442–454. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v9n2.p442-454
[11] Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 57 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. In Standar Nasional Pendidikan (Issue 102501, pp. 1–49). https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/arsip/Salinan PP Nomor 57 Tahun 2021.pdf
[12] Rahayu, L. D., & Kusuma, A. B. (2019). Peran Pendidikan Matematika Di Era Globalisasi. Prosiding Sendika, 5(1), 534–541. http://eproceedings.umpwr.ac.id/index.php/sendika/article/view/801
[13] Rianti Rahmalia, Hajidin, H., & BI. Ansari. (2020). Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Dan Disposisi Matematis Siswa Smp Melalui Model Problem Based Learning. Numeracy, 7(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v7i1.1038
[14] Sidabutar, R. (2018). Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Ditinjau dari Kebiasaan Belajar dan Lingkungan Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan, 2, 98–108. https://doi.org/. https://doi.org/10.52850/jpn.v19i2.913
[15] Stoltz, P. G. (2004). Adversity quotient: mengubah hambatan menjadi peluang(Terjemahan oleh Hermaya, T). PT Grasindo.
[16] Suardi, W. (2017). Catatan Kecil Mengenai Desain Riset Deskriptif Kualitatif. Juranal EKUBIS, 2(1), 1–11.
[17] Sukamto. (2013). Strategi quantum learning dengan pendekatan konstruktivisme untuk meningkatkan disposisi dan penalaran matematis siswa. Journal of Primary Educational, 2, 91–98.
[18] Summaries, C. E. (2019). What Students Know and Can Do. PISA 2009 at a Glance, I. https://doi.org/10.1787/g222d18af-en
[19] Susanto, R., & Sofyani, N. (2019). Analisis Keterkaitan Kecerdasan Emosional ( Emotional Quotient ) Dan Ketahanmalangan ( Adversity Quotient ) Dalam Pembentukan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas VA Di Sekolah Dasar Negeri Jelambar Baru 01. Jurnal Dinamika Sekolah Dasar, 1(1), 1–13. https://journal.pgsdfipunj.com/index.php/dinamika/article/view/96
[20] Wright, I. (2005). Publish or perish? Bmj, 330(7487), 336. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7487.336
[21] Yu, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Gu, Z., Zhong, H., Zha, Q., Yang, L., Zhu, C., & Chen, E. (2020). A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer of publications on COVID-19. Annals of Translational Medicine, 8(13), 816–816. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4235