PERBEDAAN PERCEPATAN PENYEMBUHAN PERAWATAN LUKA BERSIH DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN SODIUM KLORIDA 0,9% DAN POVIDONE IODINE 10% PADA PASIEN SECTIO CAESARIA
Abstract
Surgery is an invasive action performed by the medical team to overcome medical problems. The result that arises is the presence of postoperative wounds in patients. The wound healing process can be fast or slow. It depends on many factors, including the presence of infection, nutritional status, the state of the wound itself, and the administration of medications. Various opinions on wound care are often discussed, especially wound care cleaned with sodium chloride and povidine iodine 10%, but the reactions caused by these materials have not been widely discussed. Wound care using antiseptics is more familiar and frequently practiced. In some hospitals, wound care using 0.9% sodium chloride has been developed, but the mechanism of this material has not been explained. Objective: To compare the effect of wound treatment with 0.9% sodium chloride and 10% povidine iodine on accelerating wound healing. Methods: Quasy-Experiment (Post-Test Control Group Design) to find the effect of dependent and independent variables. This study was conducted on all post-cesarean section patients who were treated in the delivery room of Dr. Soebandi Jember Hospital. The population obtained was about 20 respondents. The results of wound treatment using sodium chloride 0.9% who experienced rapid healing were 40% of the total sample. While slow healing occurs in samples treated with povidine iodine 10%, amounting to 20% of the total sample. Then through the Fisher's Exact Test, the results obtained p = 0.628 indicate that there is no significant difference in wound care using sodium chloride 0.9% and povidine iodine 10% on the acceleration of wound healing.Suggestion: To be able to get a clear picture of the benefits of wound care using 0.9% sodium chloride and 10% povidine iodine to accelerate wound healing, further research needs to be done on the effect of wound care using more specific materials
References
[2] Black, JM & Jacob’s, EM. (1997). Medical Surgical Nursing Clinical Management for Continuity of Care. 5th edition. WB. Sounders Company. Hal. 426 – 447.
[3] Burns, N & Grove, S.K. (1991). The Practice of Nursing Research, Conduct, Critiques and Utilisation. 2nd edition. Philadelphia. WB. Sounders Co. hal. 171.
[4] Carpenito, LJ. (1997). Nursing Care Plan and Documentation. Nursing Diagnosis and Collaborative Problems 2nd edition. Philadelphia. JB. Lippincott. Hal. 784 –797.
[5] Chandra, B. (1995). Pengantar Statistik Kesehatan. Jakarta. Penerbit Buku Kedokteran. Hal. 41.
[6] Doenges, ME. (2000). Rencana Asuhan Keperawatan, Pedoman untuk Perencanaan dan Pendokumentasian Perawatan Pasien. (terjemahan).Edisi 3. Jakarta. EGC Hal. 913 – 917.
[7] Gayatri, D. (1999). Perkembangan Perawatan Luka : Dulu dan Kini. Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia. 2 (8 : 304 –308).
[8] Handerson, MA. (1992). Ilmu Bedah Untuk Perawat (terjemahan). Yogyakarta. Yayasan Essensial Medika. Hal. 43.
[9] Kozier, B. et al. (1995). Fundamental of Nursing, Conceps, Process, and Practice. 4th edition. Addison Wesley. Publishing Company Inc. Hal. 1359 – 1367.
[10] Lilley & Aucker. (1999). Pharmacology and The Nursing Process. 2nd edition. Mosby. Inc. Hal. 572 – 573.
[11] Notoadmojo, S. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kesehatan. Edisi ke-2. Jakarta. PT. Risneka Cipta. Hal. 79.
[12] Nursalam. (2002). Managemen Keperawatan, Aplikasi dalam Praktik Keperawatan Profesional. Jakarta. Salemba Medika. Hal. 20.
[13] Nursalam & Siti Pariani. (2001). Pedoman Praktis Metodologi Riset Keperawatan. Jakarta. Sagung Seto. Hal. 41 – 66.
[14] Oetomo, KS. (1994). Penggunaan Alkohol 70 % dibanding Larutan Povidine iodine 10 % sebagai Pencuci Hama Kulit pada Hernia Inguinalis Lateralis Reponibel Tidak dipublikasikan. Karya Tulis Akhir PPDS I Bedah Umum Lab/UPF Bedah Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Airlangga.
[15] Potter, P. (1998). Clinical Nursing Skill and Technique. 4th edition. Mosby. Year Book Inc. Hal. 1068 – 1137.
[16] Promise. (1998). The Chronic Wound Care System. www//http://rpromise.com/woundcare/
[17] Reeder. et al. (1997). Maternity Nursing. Family Newborn and Women’s Health Care. Philadelphia, New York. JB. Lippincott. Hal. 1013 – 1025.
[18] Sastroasmoro, S & Ismail, S. (1995) Dasar-Dasar Metodologi Penelitian Klinis. Jakarta. Binarupa Aksara. Hal. 49.
[19] Sodikin, M. (2002). Konsep Perawatan Luka Bersih. Makalah Pelatihan Keperawatan Wound Management Up Date tidak dipublikasikan. 26 Juni
[20] Sudjana. (1996). Metode Statistika. Edisi ke-6. Bandung. PT. Tarsito.
[21] Sugiyono. (2002). Statistik Untuk Penelitian. Bandung. CV.Alfabeta. Hal. 138 -144
[22] Syamsuhidayat. (1997). Buku Ajar Ilmu Bedah. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta. EGC.
[23] Taylor, C. et al. (1997). Fundamental of Nursing, The Art and Science of Nursing Care. 4th edition. Philadelphia. JB, Lippincott. Hal. 699 – 705.
[24] Thompson, J. (2000). A Practical Guide to Wound Care. Registered Nursing. 63 (1: 48 – 50).
[25] Walker, D. (1996). Back to Basic Choosing the Correct Wound Dressing. American Nursing Journal. 96 (9: 35 –39)
[26] -------. (2002). Buku Panduan Penyusunan Proposal dan Skripsi. PSIK FK-UNAIR Surabaya
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
