PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INQUIRY SMK SWASTA AR RAHMAN MEDAN KELAS X

Ari Fadilla; Dalmi Iskandar Sultani

doi:10.47492/jip.v3i3.1869

Ari Fadilla Pendidikan Ekonomi, Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al-Washliyah Medan
Dalmi Iskandar Sultani Pendidikan Ekonomi, Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al-Washliyah Medan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v3i3.1869

Keywords: Think Pair Share (TPS), Inquiry, Student Learning Outcomes

Abstract

Research title: Differences in student learning outcomes using the Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning model with the Inquiry learning model at AR Rahman Private Vocational School, Medan TA. 2021/2022. The purpose of the study was to determine the difference between the use of the Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning model and the inquiry model on economic learning outcomes. The research method uses Post-test Only Control Design. The population in this study were all students of class X OTKP Private Vocational School AR Rahman Medan. The sample of this research is class X totaling 30 students. The research instrument used was interviews, tests, and documentation. The results showed that the value of tcount is smaller than ttable, where tcount = 0.39 < ttable = 1.671. Thus, H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted = rhyme. Conclusion: there are differences in the use of the Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning model with the Inquiry learning model. Against student business economics learning outcomes.

References

[1] AL-Tabany, Trianto Ibnu Badar. 2017. Mendesain Model Pembelajaraan Inovatif. Progresif. Dan Konteksual. Jakarta: Kencana.
[2] Arif, Prabowo Tri. 2018. Belajar dan Pembelajaran.Yogyakarta: CV Budi Utama.
[3] Arikunto, Suharsini. 2014. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
[4] Aritonang 2012 : Minat dan Motivasi dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa. http://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.doc/35904799-Minat-dan-Motivasi-dalam-Meningkatkan-Ha.pdf/ (diakses pada tanggal 05 April 2017)
[5] Arsyi Mirdanda, 2018: “Motivasi Berprestasi dan Disiplin Peserta Didik serta Hubungannya dengan Hasil Belajar.” In ed. Arsyi Mirdanda. Kalimantan Barat: Yudha English Gallery, 21-22.
[6] Dalmi Iskandar Sultani, Manajemen Bimbingan Konseling di SMP Negeri Sati Batang Kuis Deli Serdang, Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah , Vol.2, No.2, 2017.
[7] Dimyati, Mulyono. 2012. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial: Nusantara.
[8] Istarani. 2011. Model Pembelajaran Inovatif (Rrfrensi Guru dalam Menentukan Model Pembelajaran). Medan: Media Persada.
[9] Lefudin 2017:50: Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
[10] Lefudin. 2014. Startergi Pembelajaran Pendekatan Pembelajaran dan Metode Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: CV Budi Utama.
[11] Mastayelni 2016. Perbedaan Hasil elajar Ekonomi Menggunakan Inquiry Dengan Konvensional. Tersedia https://ejournal.unp.ac.id.Html.
[12] Rahmat, Putra. 2018. Motivasi Berprestasi & Disiplin Peserta Didik. Pontianak: Yudha English Gallery.
[13] Rusman, 2014. Model-Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo,
[14] Shoimin, Aris. 2014. Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum. 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
[15] Slameto, 2011. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
[16] Sudjana, Nana. 2014. Penelitian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
[17] Sudjana. 2000. Metode Statistika. Bandung: Tarsito Bandung.
[18] Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
[19] Suyono. 2011. Stratergi-Startergi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Yayasan Kita Menulis.
[20] Thoboroni,2016: Belajar dan Pembelajaran Teori Praktik, Ar-Ruzz Media, Yogyakarta.
[21] Zainal Aqib. 2013. Model-Mode, Media, dan Stratergi Pembelajaran Kontekstual (Inovatif). Bandung: Yrama Widya