EFEKTIVITAS DANA OTONOMI KHUSUS DALAM MENJAWAB KEBUTUHAN MASYARAKAT ASLI PAPUA DI KABUPATEN BIAK NUMFOR
Abstract
The balance of the Special Autonomy Fund for Papua Province and regencies/municipalities in the context of accelerating development in Papua in various sectors will be realized if its management is in accordance with the principles of people's welfare and monitoring mechanisms that are in accordance with the principle of expediency. This study aims to identify and explain the suitability of the balancing regulation of the Papua Province Special Autonomy Fund with the principles of people's welfare and the benefits of the monitoring mechanism for the allocation of the Papua Province Special Autonomy Fund by the Papua Provincial Government. With the end of the special autonomy fund in 2021, it is necessary to evaluate the use of the special autonomy fund. On the other hand, many people expressly refuse to continue because people think that the special autonomy fund has failed and has caused polemics in the indigenous Papuan community. Many Papuan academics say that the special autonomy funds are not effective because there are no derivative rules from government regulations related to special autonomy. The management of the Papua Province Special Autonomy Fund has not met the principles of the welfare state, because the distribution is greater for the Province than for the Regency/City. The mechanism for monitoring the utilization of the Special Autonomy Fund has not guaranteed the fulfillment of the principle of benefit. The absence of a Papuan Governor's Regulation on Special Task Forces and on program selection criteria and the lack of a supervisory role from a special Papua Province institution as a form of external supervision. So that it becomes a polemic among the indigenous Papuans, especially in the Biak Numfor district. This research is a normative juridical research that wants to identify from the legal aspect. The data used consists of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The research method used is normative juridical research which aims to examine the legal aspects related to the procedures for managing and supervising the Papua Special Autonomy Fund between Provinces and Regencies/Cities. The location of this research is Biak Numfor Regency. The subjects of this study were the Chairperson of the DPRD Biak Numfor Regency, Milka Rumaropen, and the Chairperson of the Customary cloth kankanra Byak, Biak Numfor Regency. Mr. Yarangga, as well as the Papuan people, are in the Numfor breed district. In determining the research subject, a purposive sampling was used. The sampling technique is not based on probability, but is chosen to describe the juridical situation related to the problem under study, or the sample aims to create key informants, then the sample is determined on a rolling basis according to the research needs or the data required. The analysis technique used in this research is carried out with a flow that includes data reduction, data presentation, and verification stage. The verified data from this research are in the form of expressions or words, descriptions of field facts which are entirely obtained from informants, observation sheets and documents from the Papua Province Special Autonomy Fund. the traditional head of the Biak Territory.
References
[2] Bagir Manan, 2001, “Menyongsong Fajar Otonomi Daerah”, Pusat Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum UII, Yogyakarta.
[3] Bohari, 1992, “PengawasanKeuangan Negara”, Rajawali Press, Jakarta.
[4] Faisal Akbar Nasution, Kebijakan Perimbangan Keuangan antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah Pasca Reformasi, Jurnal Hukum No. 3 VOL. 18 Juli 2011 : 381 – 404, hlm. 383.
[5] Jhon Agustinus (2014). Analogi Manajemen Keuangan Model Affirmative
[6] Action dalam perspektif Otonomi Khusus. (Model Pengeloaan Dana Otsus di Papua).
[7] Kum K, Sasmito C. Analisis Implementasi Pengelolaan Dana Otonomi Khusus Papua Berbasis Program Rencana Strategis Pembangunan Kampung (Respek) di Kabupaten Mimika Provinsi Papua. Reformasi. 2018 Jun 19;8(1):84-99.
[8] Lukman Hakim, Filosofi Kewenangan Organ Lembaga Daerah, Setara Press, Malang, 2012, hlm 33
[9] Miles dan Huberman. 1962. Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber Tenaga Metode-Metode Baru. UI Press. Jakarta.
[10] M.Hatjon Philipus, “Sistem pembagian kekuasaan Negara (Analisis Hukum Tata Negara)”,Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga, hal. 1.2.
[11] Moleong. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya Offset. Bandung.
[12] Melanesia Pos.Com. 08 Januari 2013. Nabire Kota Mati, Bupati Tidur, Kemana Larimya Dana Pendidikan Untuk Mahasiswa. Oktovianus pugau. Jayapura.
[13] Peraturan Daerah N0. 05.2006. Pembangunan Pendidikan di Provinsi Papua
[14] Peraturan Daerah Khusus No. 25. 2013. Pembagian Penerimaan dan pengelolaan dana Otonomi Khusus (OTSUS)
[15] Peraturan Gubernur No. 32. 2014. Pelaksanaan Dana Otonomi Khusus (OTSUS) Bidang Pendidikan.
[16] Pramadyanti. 2015. Analisis Pengaruh Dana Otonomi Khusus, Pendapatan
[17] Daerah, Belanja Modalterhadap tingkat kesejahteraan di Provinsi Aceh, Papua dan Papua Barat.
[18] Rhodes. 2000. Demon In My View, Delaccorte Press. New York
[19] Salle. Agustinus, 2011. Akuntabilitas Keuangan (Studi Pengelolaan Dana
[20] Otonomi Khusus Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun
[21] 2001 tentang Otonomi Khusus Bagi Provinsi Papua). Malang.
[22] Republik Indoensia. Undang-Undang Nomor 21. 2001. Tentang Otonomi Khusus (OTSUS) Bagi Provinsi Papua
[23] Trijono, Lambang. 2013. Pembangunan Sebagai Perdamaian: Rekonstruksi Indonesia
[24] Pasca-Konflik, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia-Undang-Undang Nomor 20. 2003. Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional
[25] Undang-Undang Nomor 25. 2004. Tentang Sistem perencanaan pembangunan Nasional.
[26] Zona Dinamika. Com. 2015. Demo Mahsiswa: Dana Pendidikan tinggal Kenangan. Jayapura.
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
